HomeBussinessFood Safety Authority of Ireland is reconsidering ‘novel food’ ruling on monk...

Food Safety Authority of Ireland is reconsidering ‘novel food’ ruling on monk fruit extract

Date:

Related stories

spot_imgspot_img

Monk fruit is used in traditional Chinese medicine. Photo: Getty

The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) is to reconsider a decision that an extract of monk fruit manufactured by a Chinese firm must go through an evaluation process before it can be ­marketed, the High Court heard.

Guilin GFS Monk Fruit Corporation brought judicial review proceedings in 2022 claiming the FSAI acted “irrationally” and “unreasonably” when it classified its monk fruit decoction product as a “novel food” under an EU regulation.

Monk fruit is a small round fruit from the melon family primarily cultivated in southern and eastern provinces of ­China. Decoctions are water extracts obtained by steeping the fruit in hot water.

A “novel food” is one that has not been used to a significant degree for human consumption in the EU before May 15, 1997. It must therefore meet requirements including being safe for consumers and being properly labelled so as not to mislead.

Guilin, which is registered in Guangxi, China, and is a joint venture with a New Zealand company called BioVittoria, claimed the FSAI decision would have “serious, long-lasting and unjustified repercussions” for the firm.

It was claimed it was completely unclear how and why the FSAI rejected extensive documentation Guilin submitted about the pre-1997 food consumption of the decoction in the United Kingdom.

The authority also misdirected itself on what was the appropriate legal test to apply in determining significant pre-1997 consumption within the EU had not been proven, it was claimed.

In legal documents, the company also said it provided evidence from members of the Chinese community resident in the EU that they consumed monk fruit “foods”, which were “readily available” in most Chinese supermarkets in the UK/EU prior to 1997.

The FSAI, it said, has described data from questionnaires and face-to-face interviews as being of “limited use” as primary evidence of a history of significant consumption, since it may not be verifiable compared to product receipts or import and export data published by a reliable source.

In 2022, Guilin was granted leave by the High Court to bring its proceedings against the FSAI and the matter was adjourned from time to time.

Earlier this week Ms Justice Niamh Hyland was told it had been agreed to quash the decision and, on consent, to send it back to the FSAI for reconsideration.

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img